I waited 60 days to take a seat
and ask an expert questions I possessed;
his specialty is swamped by a complete
disruption of nutrition, he’ll attest.
I liked him and respect his skill, but guessed
correctly he’d recite the standard care.
So while I’m willing to endure a test,
I doubt this course will get me anywhere.
A bit concerned about last night’s report –
her cracking voice, fatigue so evident,
a mess she tried to clean of vile sort –
and knowing that I have no precedent
for how the 99-year olds comport
themselves (without a time line prevalent),
I carried tender feelings to my rest,
and hope by gentle passage she’ll be blessed.
What harm’s it do, imagining a plot
that justifies the actions of the few
I’m contemplating? Whether fact or not,
what harm’s it do?
I planned to write about the things I knew,
but such did not enchant – so I forgot
that tactic and decided I’d imbue
the characters I hear of with a shot
of probability. Their acts I view
as driven by a circumstantial lot.
What harm’s it do?
Can she be indolent? If it’s a skill,
she may need time to find her expertise.
Since seventeen the girl’s derived a thrill
from countering her mother’s harsh decrees
of selfishness and laziness. Her will
has led to diligent activities
that now appear a form of O.C.D.
To idleness she’ll put her energy.
Is this bad journalism, or contempt
for every reader? Someone okayed “hype”
to end a headline, like they were exempt
from objectivity. Of course I gripe
to read “ideal”’ as if it were a type
of lukewarm adjective, and see there’s no
distinguishing veracity from tripe.
I wish I could respect the pressured flow.
I’ve heard a dog’s the best security,
against a village pillager or thief
who’d breach the door and mess with property,
disturb the peace, and give domestic grief.
Although they can be noisy, I agree:
canine as excellent’s been my belief.
Perhaps instead the guarding can be kinked,
and given to a dragon that’s extinct.
What good’s it do, to trumpet your own praise?
Is anybody listening to you?
What carries weight in each self-serving phrase?
What good’s it do?
For even if the claims you make are true,
they won’t convince a soul. Are there displays
that can inspire them to honor you?
You either know your value or you’ll craze,
attempting to compel I-don’t-know-who.
A bluster only windiness conveys.
What’s good’s it do?
Encountering a pattern on real walls
while using a salon facility,
projects me back. Now memory recalls
a time when talent hung where all could see
above a wainscoting. True papery
design that can be felt as well as seen
provides a touch so satisfactory,
it renders pallid my computer screen.
Go figure this – she focused the complaint
on one of two. Maternal prejudice
from her is never subtle, nothing faint –
go figure this.
What she deems cute is dull and obvious.
She thinks a gripe and blurts without restraint,
and any wound she’ll with a snarl dismiss.
I think she’d try the patience of a saint.
And as for me, I’m on the precipice
of critical – I never find her quaint.
Go figure this.
I notice Berkeley dogwoods every year,
when they put forth their multitudes of bloom.
My brother said they cannot flourish here
(our air’s too damp, there’s insufficient room
for roots to find the needed pedosphere),
but I don’t see impending any doom.
Today I aim to imitate the tree:
to stretch in light on earth, and simply be.
 | sputterpub on About Mom, With Love |
 | groomie on About Mom, With Love |
| sputterpub on No Blocks |
 | Caleb Cheruiyot on No Blocks |
| sputterpub on For Now |
Sputterpub's Blog 